Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pmustang

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27
1
You folks are the Magnum PI of Mustang Sleuths

Love it

2
1968 Shelby GT350/500/500KR / Gent looking for his dads GT500
« on: March 26, 2024, 02:39:18 PM »
Very legit Facebook page that helps people find cars that mean alot to them


3
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 25, 2024, 06:08:17 AM »
Hello Folks,

As you kindly gave me advice I will keep you informed of my decision (right or wrong) and the outcome after install

So I went with a new 68 and later balancer and pulley.

I will have those installed and see where we are then. Of course I will report back

Thanks again

4
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 23, 2024, 02:13:26 PM »
Thank you everyone

Very helpful posts

Now to make a decision and order some bits for when I come back to the states in June

Thank you. Peter

6
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 22, 2024, 01:39:59 PM »
Thank you Scott

I get what you are saying, by changing the damper then other alignment issues may present themselves. As the car has no air or power steering then my alignment issues would potentially be smaller in comparison to a fully loaded up engine belt system.

If I understand you correctly: Your feelings are that by buying the correct 428SCJ balancer which is a larger unit then what I have that there won't be, or shouldn't be any issues due to my current and the possible new SCJ correct one being neutral balance. So they won't, in theory affect the current balance of the rotating assembly.

thanks for your assistance.

7
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 22, 2024, 01:35:21 PM »
Thank you Bob

I have had what you said earlier confirmed by another person about the Balancer on my car being an Early 390 unit

I spoke to the mechanic this morning and he did say the engine, although strong as an ox does have a light vibration at higher rpms. Not so much that is feels there is something massively wrong but its definitely there and definitely in the engine.

So your thoughts are that it may cause further issues if I was to source and install a correct SCJ balancer on the engine?

Thank you once again. peter

8
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 22, 2024, 07:29:51 AM »
Just went to view the car again

Definitely no room for a normal balancer

Looks like a cast pulley would be needed

Now to find one

9
Replicas and Tribute / Re: Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 22, 2024, 01:59:39 AM »
Hello Bob

Thank you for taking the time to help me out

Car is a 68 C code fastback that had this motor swapped in.

I bought the car several years ago and brought it to the UK

Engine is a C scratch block. (Saw when installing a different trans)

Engine has been running and zero vibration. The car runs like a scalded car

Forgive me for my naïveté on the matter. But if the existing balancer/pulley is taken off. Is it a normal crank snout or is the hatchet weight assembly integral?

I’ve had many of these cars. But predominantly small blocks so have no experience with the hatchet weight setup

Trying to find out what would lock me into using the cast iron extra pulley as opposed to the later
68 style balancer and bolt on pulley

Thank you. Peter

10
Replicas and Tribute / Dual pulley on an early 428
« on: March 21, 2024, 04:39:45 PM »
Looking for expert advice on how to add a dual crank pulley to this setup

I deal with a bunch of small block and 390 cars every year

Not run into this before. C scratch 428

What I am dealing with is  said to be a 61-67 FE balancer/pulley setup

The engine is in my personal 68FB

I  having Borgeson Installed and need a dual pulley on the crank pulley.

I have plenty of three bolt single/dual and triple pulleys

But I am told the cast one is the one I need

But others have said I can add a 3 bolt like those found on a small block

Can anyone shed any light on this?

1st two photos are my engines balancer and single I’ll do

Third is what someone recommended

Forth is what someone else
recommended

Thank you.

Peter

12
Wanted to Buy / Re: 1967 High Performance Manual
« on: February 11, 2024, 03:49:07 PM »
Contact Vern Estes

13
The Lounge / Re: Do you like the direction SAAC has been going?
« on: December 22, 2023, 02:06:01 AM »
I was part of another marquees forum for many years. There was a crazy person on there that drove everyone insane. The forum was run by a business servicing the cars we all loved. Nothing was ever done about this person and he was on there for years much to the detriment of the forum.

I didn’t then and don’t now understand the allowing of someone to create such a distraction to the core reason for the forums existence

And blocking them here doesn’t remove their name from your vision which is a shame as you keep seeing the name pop up


14
The Lounge / Re: Starting to lay out new work shop
« on: December 13, 2023, 03:47:30 AM »
Mine is 22 x 90

All I would say is that if you want four post lifts you need a deeper shop for the ramps. Those babies are long! or have removable ramps. Walking around four posts at my buddies shop is a chore

I made darn sure my ceiling height at the ends could allow stackable lifts. I have three full height bays in the centre (35 feet)

Car is not a Shelby

15
The Lounge / Where are you located?
« on: October 17, 2023, 02:27:12 AM »
Hey folks

Noticing a slightly alarming trend here on posts where folks are looking for a part

Unfortunately this trend is firmly established on Facebook

Just putting this out there for folks that may not see what’s going on with Facebook

The volume of scammers is absolutely insane. Some posts have ten scam responses to a oarts wanted request on Facebook.

The number one question is “where are you located?”  Well before saying they have the part or anything else.  Of course that is to determine the location of the OP so the scammer can say they are in a location that’s too far for collection

Just making folks aware in case so they can be vigilant

Ensure the person offering you the part is either A: a known entity or B: you can verify they exist and have the part they are offering.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27