SAAC Forum

I think this says it all...

Does anyone have a copy of the antenna mounting template the dealers used to drill the hole in the rear quarter for the 68's?

Chris

Quote from: Coralsnake on April 10, 2018, 09:39:30 AM
According to a close friend....the awards were at a Good Guys show. No SAAC or MCA.

Caveat Emptor.....

A little misleading, but thats not unexpected.

Good Guy's, SAAC, MCA, Miami Car and Airplane Show... its all the same. 

Quote from: Tired Sheep on April 09, 2018, 02:14:50 PM
60 plus catagories and you cant find a place to post?

Funny those florida guys never seem to have any trouble posting every damn car show ....

 Have either of you tried contacting the administrator yet?

http://www.pythonrestoration.com/#2904

Computer records back in the day?  That's funny. Not sure they used computers at DMV in the 60's and they sure didn't waste any effort putting 60's paper files on computer.

Quote from: KR500 on March 20, 2018, 04:44:04 PM

Quote from: Bob Gaines on March 20, 2018, 04:31:31 PM

Quote from: Coralsnake on March 20, 2018, 04:23:48 PM
I agree...

We should randomly post local events, pictures found on the internet, answer our own posts and other nonsensical items to get our post totals up.

+2

+1 with sarcasm   

You can say it as many times as you want it doesn't sink in...

Try saying it in Spanish...

Maybe in the interim you can post banners in both languages... 

I am always fascinated by the opinions of those who never plan to enter concours.

Last time I drove my Shelby the cops followed me home, does that count?

Quote from: 557 on March 03, 2018, 10:44:29 PM
On the positive side no more DUIs...On the negative 1 well placed computer hack or signal interference and we all die......

Systems are hackable because administrators are either lazy or lack the knowledge to secure their network. Can't hack a closed system.  . Besides your missing the point of autonomous cars. Their programming is in ROM (read ONLY memory) can't be written to by hacking.

Additionally weak user passwords are to blame for many security breaches.  Here are 25 common passwords. Recognize any? 

123456
123456789
qwerty
12345678
111111
1234567890
1234567
password
123123
987654321
qwertyuiop
mynoob
123321
666666
18atcskd2w
7777777
1q2w3e4r
654321
555555
3rjs1la7qe
google
1q2w3e4r5t
123qwe
zxcvbnm
1q2w3e

Quote from: deathsled on March 03, 2018, 10:03:38 PM
Mars already has driverless rovers.

Zactly

Quote from: jguyer on March 03, 2018, 09:32:45 PM

Quote from: Chris Thauberger on March 03, 2018, 08:02:44 PM

Quote from: deathsled on March 03, 2018, 07:46:11 PM

Quote from: Chris Thauberger on March 03, 2018, 07:34:47 PM

Quote from: deathsled on March 03, 2018, 07:18:03 PM
Everything breaks down including driverless cars.  The general rule of entropy governs all both great and small.  My question then becomes, when said driverless car breaks down and causes a chain reaction of death and mayhem, who will be liable?  The owner of the car for failure to maintain?  The car manufacture for products liability i.e. design defect, manufacturing defect?  All of the above?  Interesting times await.

Richard E.

When driverless car "breaks down" all other cars are notified and slow down simultaneously, merge into lanes not blocked by "breakdown" and continue on there way.  No rubber necking means no secondary issues.

Ding ding ding!  Excellent point.  Downside is a catastrophic failure.  But I'm with yah.  There will be far fewer accidents.

Not sure what your definition of catastrophic failure is. Cars communicate with other vehicles within a certain range wirelessly. Primary communication would be with master system. Redundant communication means likelihood of catastrophic failure due to loss of situational awareness of other vehicles highly unlikely. Most likely a full communication loss would result in a parking lot.

EMP. (electromagnetic pulse) That's when you'll wish you still had points in your distributor.

...or martians. Don't forget about martians.

Quote from: deathsled on March 03, 2018, 07:46:11 PM

Quote from: Chris Thauberger on March 03, 2018, 07:34:47 PM

Quote from: deathsled on March 03, 2018, 07:18:03 PM
Everything breaks down including driverless cars.  The general rule of entropy governs all both great and small.  My question then becomes, when said driverless car breaks down and causes a chain reaction of death and mayhem, who will be liable?  The owner of the car for failure to maintain?  The car manufacture for products liability i.e. design defect, manufacturing defect?  All of the above?  Interesting times await.

Richard E.

When driverless car "breaks down" all other cars are notified and slow down simultaneously, merge into lanes not blocked by "breakdown" and continue on there way.  No rubber necking means no secondary issues.

Ding ding ding!  Excellent point.  Downside is a catastrophic failure.  But I'm with yah.  There will be far fewer accidents.

Not sure what your definition of catastrophic failure is. Cars communicate with other vehicles within a certain range wirelessly. Primary communication would be with master system. Redundant communication means likelihood of catastrophic failure due to loss of situational awareness of other vehicles highly unlikely. Most likely a full communication loss would result in a parking lot.