Quote from: Bob Gaines on April 09, 2020, 06:32:37 PMQuote from: 6s2020 on April 09, 2020, 05:18:41 PMSorry I'm not going to feed the troll.Quote from: Bob Gaines on April 09, 2020, 01:59:53 PMQuote from: Bob Gaines on April 07, 2020, 02:33:29 PMSteve, please don't make this discussion confrontational as your writing tone seems to indicate . I want to get to the truth as much as you . To my point that you highlighted in reply #28 are some pictures of 67 models with engine mods installed as delivered from San Jose plant to SA. A picture is worth a thousand words. It is undeniable that the engine mods were on those cars. Of course they are 67 models but it speaks to the validity of my statement . As I said before the discussion is about pinning down the time line better. I am glad to consider what you have already written and also the other information that you allege you have that you offered to show if you want to send it to me. You have Jeff Speegle and my email address that you used in the past . Help me better understand your point of view. I will stand by.Quote from: Wedgeman on April 07, 2020, 01:34:58 PMThat is well known to many early Shelby aficionado's. Since your not familiar FYI That was in 65 vintage mags and were black paint intakes ,exhaust manifolds etc .Of course black intakes signify's 65 production . Later Ford memos to SA documenting the requests for expected volume so that Ford could get the highrise intakes etc. on hand at the Cleveland engine plant is what has driven the consensus of opinion for that time period being the change over. Another is a early snafu involving the engine plant painting the aluminum intakes engine color by mistake which also confirms Fords involvement with the installation. We do know that SA had to install at least the intakes at that point until Ford could figure out a procedure to not paint them. The footage in the video posted raises more questions then answers IMO because it appears to come after the time that SA was waiting for Ford to get the engine production issue figured out. It is undeniable that Ford did the conversions at some point. The discussion is about pinning down the time line better.
I vaguely recall someone posting somewhere years ago about SA selling Cast Iron 4V 289 Intakes & Autolite 4V Carbs dirt cheap. If confirmed..wouldn't that verify that work was done at SA ....?
WOW, there is another thread on here talking about this exact "projecting" to displace one's own behaviour.... or some such shit.
And are these photos your come back evidence, they are 67s ,so that is one time point that ford fitted the parts. No one is saying different.
Show some 65-66 photos or film to counter Steves evidence.
Help us better understand your point of view.
This is why some stop showing great original SAI examples as they just get dismissed.
Wow again, you just proved my point.