Topblissgt,
It's clear that you feel people are picking the car apart and that there should have been more support for the car when you posted / discussed it. And, its also clear (to be honest) that you won't see people's responses any other way. I understand, but I don't agree.
The heart of the issue (IMO) is that there were claims made about the car that are inaccurate - mainly, the claim that the car was so original.
As has been mentioned previously, this forum is run by and supported by enthusiasts of all levels when it comes to knowledge. I will happily admit that I am a novice, but I'm learning from the people of this forum everyday.
Here's what I've found to be true about this forum: if you come in thinking you know what's what without facts, you'll get torched, as most of the people of this forum are not only passionate about these cars, but they are also EXTREMELY knowledgeable. What I also know (from my very first posts on the old forum) is that representing things about a car as they are is ALSO supported. Let me share a quick example.
I have an early 1967 Shelby GT350, and during the initial restoration, I made the decision to install some "not correct" parts on my car (an aftermarket aluminum radiator, aftermarket dash, etc.). I posted pictures of the process online, and feared the worst. The reaction? "That's awesome! Drive the wheels off that thing!" NO ONE criticized what I was doing with the car, as I never came across as misrepresenting what the car was or what I was doing to it.
Fast forward to after the restoration was complete, and I attended SAAC 42 last year (my first SAAC event). I had been in touch with 2 extremely knowledgeable people regarding 1967 Shelbys (Bob Gaines and JD). Bob offered to have me assist with judging at SAAC 42, as I was eager to learn more, so I did. That experience not only taught me a ton about the 67s, but it also changed my mind on what I wanted to do next with my car. Literally, I came back from that event and started a multi-month process of returning my car to concours status. Again, I posted pictures of the process, and not once did anyone give me a heard time, even though I kept a few things non-original (who doesn't love a great sounding aftermarket exhaust!
).
Here's the point - the forum (in aggregate) supports all cars (my experience). What the forum does not support are misleading claims. Again, had the car not been touted as being incredibly original, there would have been high fives all around. However, the people of this forum will not allow someone to share misleading information or make bold claims that don't align.
I don't know if this helps at all, but this is my experience. And, BTW - these are the same people who will answer questions via phone at 1am about the the correct engine bay overspray and the soft edge needed towards the firewall side of the front fenders (thanks, JD!)
In the end, don't miss out on the blessing of what this forum can be for you or the current owner. And, in the words of a friend "It's time to move on".
Just my 2 cents...