News:

We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ

Main Menu

'67 AR or AM bottom leaves

Started by 2112, August 30, 2019, 10:22:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

2112

Looking for a nice pair of bottom leaf springs for a 1967 Shelby with AR stamping

Hoping for date in the last quarter of 1966 or the first couple months of 1967.

With permission, I have posted pictures of Bob's listing (which I did not see in time) to show a nice February '67 pair.

Thank you Bob.

Bob Gaines

Your early car would more likely have AM not AR.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

67_1183

Hi 2112,

  If I am correct that your car is #875 (SJ 2/1/67), your car was completed at San Jose 1 week after my car #1183 (SJ 1/26/67).  Here is a picture of the bottom leaf on #1183.  Both springs are date coded the 297th day of 1966 and are C7ZA 5556 AM.

If I am incorrect about your car number, my apologies.

67_1183
2nd owner of 67 GT500 #1183 since September 1976

Richstang

I'd suggest checking your DSO group's SVO sheets. They have most of these Ford installed parts listed by number.
1967 Shelby Research Group 

www.1967ShelbyResearch.com
www.facebook.com/groups/1967shelbyresearch

1991-1993 SAAC MKI, MKII, & Snake Registrar

2112

I interpreted my DSO as using AR

But I am thinking getting exactly what I want is slim. Even AM stamped is better than what I have now, so I would consider those as well.

texas swede

My GT500, #1317 finished at San Jose by the end of January 1967 has both springs marked,
C7ZA-5556 AM 298 E 6.
Texas Swede

67350#1242

67 GT350  SJ 02/01/67  Gray 4spd A/C
67 Coupe  SJ 11/16/66  White Auto A/C PDB

shelbydoug

68 GT350 Lives Matter!

Richstang

DSO 2555 (106 units) were built from approximately 1/31/67 to 2/8/67 .
The SVO sheets list them as planned for the AR springs, but does that mean FORD actually built them that way.

Anyone else with a car in this DSO that can tell us what they have on it. I'm curious because of the date overlaps others have noted.
1967 Shelby Research Group 

www.1967ShelbyResearch.com
www.facebook.com/groups/1967shelbyresearch

1991-1993 SAAC MKI, MKII, & Snake Registrar

DRGT350


JD

Would seem that more cars got the AM version springs than previously thought.

(oh these dang '67 Shelby's)
'67 Shelby Headlight Bucket Grommets https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=254.0
'67 Shelby Lower Grille Edge Protective Strip https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=1237.0

J_Speegle

DRGT350 thanks for sharing a picture of 67 #1358's spring.  Does push back my data forward by about 2 weeks. The date seems to suggest that San Jose received another shipment from the last batch.
Jeff Speegle- Mustang & Shelby detail collector, ConcoursMustang.com mentor :) and Judge

Richstang

#12
Quote from: JD on August 31, 2019, 03:29:14 PM
Would seem that more cars got the AM version springs than previously thought.

(oh these dang '67 Shelby's)


It seems there were several CHANGE NOTICES issued in mid November to switch over to 'AR' springs from 'AM', going back to even the early DSO's.
The question is; When did Ford implement the change?
1967 Shelby Research Group 

www.1967ShelbyResearch.com
www.facebook.com/groups/1967shelbyresearch

1991-1993 SAAC MKI, MKII, & Snake Registrar

J_Speegle

Quote from: Richstang on August 31, 2019, 05:32:53 PM
It seems there were several CHANGE NOTICES issued in mid November to switch over to 'AR' springs from 'AM', going back to even the early DSO's.
The question is; When did Ford implement the change?

Right now (based on the data I've collected) between the last days of Feb 1967 and the second week of March 1967. Approx a two week period.
Jeff Speegle- Mustang & Shelby detail collector, ConcoursMustang.com mentor :) and Judge