Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - greekz

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36
1
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: 66 Alternator Gauge Issue
« on: March 25, 2023, 03:24:13 PM »
Have you considered the gauge itself?  If it is the original, it might be the problem.  Just a shot in the dark.

My '67 is just the opposite, jumps at idle and smooth at speed.

3
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: 66 Fuel Gauge Issue
« on: March 15, 2023, 09:42:47 PM »
Thanks for the information.  That is one of the things that make this forum great.

4
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Z VIN prefix
« on: March 15, 2023, 03:24:21 PM »
Greek, I'm surprised you think the "Z' stamp on the VIN plate has anything to do with the train derailment.
Back in 2018, I mentioned while collecting VIN plate photos, I noticed they stated adding "Z" stampe on 4/27/67.

https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=2339.msg20003#msg20003

Back then, we were not sure of the meaning and there were a few ideas floarting around.
Our current theory (SRG) follows along that date, as we have reviewed many more cars VIN plates.
In just about every case all the cars have the Z stamping.
Any exception were likely missed, just like the door tags that were not removed on a few cars.
We think this was the start of the Ford takeover and a method of noting which cars were now on Ford's accounting.
Many other details suggest this to be true, such as invoices sent to Ford by SAI to capture as many $$$ as possbile before that time.



Richstang,

Not thinking that at all.  Merely suggesting that the car might have been inspected by someone at the California DMV.  That inspector may have noticed the Z on the VIN plate and made it part of the VIN for registration purposes even though it is not designated on the factory invoice.  The California DMV has always marched to a beat of a different drum when it comes to car registrations.  The rules even vary between DMV agents.  One never knows what the California DMV might do on any given day.

Hi greekz,
Sorry I missunderstood your reply. Thanks for the clarification reply. (I did notice your comments in the linked in post.
Your reply sounds all to familiar with unwrittten rules, designated by location.
We are trying to look at any unregestered cars from California (nearly impossible to find) for how they were initially documented.

(The derailment cars likely all had a Z stamp with the completion dates in May)



No problem, I should have been more clear in my first post.

I always keep an eye out for '67's, but unfortunately, I mostly see '65's and '66's.

5
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Z VIN prefix
« on: March 15, 2023, 12:11:07 PM »
Greek, I'm surprised you think the "Z' stamp on the VIN plate has anything to do with the train derailment.
Back in 2018, I mentioned while collecting VIN plate photos, I noticed they stated adding "Z" stampe on 4/27/67.

https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=2339.msg20003#msg20003

Back then, we were not sure of the meaning and there were a few ideas floarting around.
Our current theory (SRG) follows along that date, as we have reviewed many more cars VIN plates.
In just about every case all the cars have the Z stamping.
Any exception were likely missed, just like the door tags that were not removed on a few cars.
We think this was the start of the Ford takeover and a method of noting which cars were now on Ford's accounting.
Many other details suggest this to be true, such as invoices sent to Ford by SAI to capture as many $$$ as possbile before that time.



Richstang,

Not thinking that at all.  Merely suggesting that the car might have been inspected by someone at the California DMV.  That inspector may have noticed the Z on the VIN plate and made it part of the VIN for registration purposes even though it is not designated on the factory invoice.  The California DMV has always marched to a beat of a different drum when it comes to car registrations.  The rules even vary between DMV agents.  One never knows what the California DMV might do on any given day.

6
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Z VIN prefix
« on: March 14, 2023, 06:29:53 PM »
The Z is not on my invoice, but it is part of the VIN on the earliest California registration I have from 1976.  I can only speculate when it was added as part if the VIN.  Perhaps being one of the derailment cars, the car was inspected at the salvage yard and the Z was added to the paperwork at that time.  But, that is just a guess.

7
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: 6S1060 surfaced in Slovakia
« on: March 09, 2023, 03:19:19 PM »
Never ceases to amaze me where these cars show up.  Thanks for posting.

8
Very nice.  I bet it screams!

9
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Paint colors and how they stack up
« on: February 25, 2023, 01:01:53 PM »
Thanks for the chart. You folks at the SRG do a great job compiling information.  Interesting most cars were lime green.  I wonder what drove the decision to offer the most cars in that color.
I believe the lime gold was one of the most popular colors on Mustangs in general in 67 and 68.

+1 - Lime Gold was a new, trendy and popular color, the SAAC registry points out that nearly 25% of the '67 Shelby's were Lime Gold.

I guess for the new car buyer that was the case.  The majority of my teenage group in the 60's were driving used cars with two-tone paint from the 50's and popular colors from the early 60's(black, red, blue, and white).  Do not remember seeing many lime green cars back then.

10
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Paint colors and how they stack up
« on: February 25, 2023, 11:28:48 AM »
Thanks for the chart. You folks at the SRG do a great job compiling information.  Interesting most cars were lime green.  I wonder what drove the decision to offer the most cars in that color.

11
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: 67 GT350 ad
« on: February 20, 2023, 02:40:18 PM »
Still my favorite magazine ad of all time ...

I agree.

I have that one and it receives a wide range of comments depending on the person looking at the ad.

12
SAAC Forum Discussion Area / Re: car continues to run
« on: February 16, 2023, 03:17:24 PM »
I had that problem a few years back and it was the ignition switch. 

13
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: 1966 Shelby VIN Tag Rivet Color
« on: January 30, 2023, 08:24:10 PM »
Thanks!

14
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / 1966 Shelby VIN Tag Rivet Color
« on: January 30, 2023, 05:55:50 PM »
I am sure this has been asked before, but could not find the answer by searching. 

What is the correct rivet color for the VIN tag?

15
Up For Auction / Re: 5S208 - on Bring A Trailer
« on: January 26, 2023, 12:51:30 PM »
Is the vehicle selling with no reserve?

I does not say so in the auction title. 

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 36