Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 6T6/7

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: painted magnum restoration
« on: March 26, 2024, 11:08:12 PM »
Dave,
Could you elaborate a bit about how you made your stencils?
Thanks!
So I own a company that does pinstriping, graphics, vehicle wraps, corporate advertising etc. I used masking tape over the opening and did a pencil rubbing, I scan that to my sign software and draw a vector pattern over that. I then cut a pattern in paint mask vinyl. I brought 3 of my wheels in and go back and forth making test fits and adjustments in the vector pattern to find the right balance of one or 2 patterns that fit the openings as best as possible. Probably went through 8 or 10 test fittings until I was happy. There are some consistent inconsistencies in how the centers were stamped out but there are some slight variations from wheel to wheel. We're talking 1/32 to 1/64 of an inch.
dz
Ok, thanks for that info. I was wondering what was involved, including addressing possible variations, etc. Beautiful end product!

2
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: painted magnum restoration
« on: March 26, 2024, 06:32:36 PM »
Dave,
Could you elaborate a bit about how you made your stencils?
Thanks!

3
Up For Auction / Re: 67402F4A00923 on BAT
« on: September 07, 2023, 05:55:54 PM »
May want to consider hiding the Ford VIN shown on the Marti report.

4
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Functional lower scoops question
« on: August 16, 2023, 02:12:56 PM »

Added to the list.  As for now my list is for the two piece version which are all functional as far as we know

Yes, would be good to verify that ALL have actual ducting not a blocked-off opening.

"6T6/7" can you feel inside the scoop is not blocked-off? and is there an opening in the rear wheel wells, see attached for reference...



JD, yes can see and feel opening at each end and duct in between.

5
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Functional lower scoops question
« on: August 16, 2023, 12:37:15 PM »
Here's 1661, functional brake scoops, resprayed but never apart. Completion 4/17.
Did 1661 have a rearward rivet out of the view of the forward two?
Bob, here's a view showing a couple additional rivets further back. I'll let you interpret as needed. Just providing data point which may or may not be useful for this production time frame.

6
1967 Shelby GT350/500 / Re: Functional lower scoops question
« on: August 15, 2023, 08:09:58 PM »
Here's 1661, functional brake scoops, resprayed but never apart. Completion 4/17.

7
SAAC Forum Discussion Area / Re: Looking for Photo Info...
« on: May 22, 2023, 05:27:31 PM »
FYI- There was some earlier mention of Jack Khoury and Jim Benavides. I think Jack Khoury was a production manager. Jim Benavides was the 427 Cobra Project Engineer (i.e., Chuck Cantwell's counterpart).

8
Up For Auction / Re: 67200F5A03002 on BAT
« on: March 10, 2023, 08:58:33 PM »
Interesting that the air cleaner base (that is, assuming its original to the car) doesn't have the small 1/8 nipple that's commonly believed to be correct for non-thermactor '67 GT350s.

9
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: 66 GT350 Window Stickers
« on: May 16, 2022, 03:41:43 PM »
Seems like the early version wouldn't necessarily be limited to carryovers. Looks like it might work ideally for early post-carryover cars.
Mark

10
Jon, at the risk of going by memory, I'm thinking the original filters had reddish maroon color seals. I think there were repos years ago with correct color seals, but are hard to find now. In the meantime, the filters you mentioned with orange seals should be fine functional replacements. Others will have more info (or corrections). Mark

11
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: Front end height
« on: December 07, 2021, 01:10:35 PM »
To me, your car looks pretty darn nice as is :)

12
I would think anything dated August '66 or later as too late to be '66 production, leftover or otherwise.  More likely intended for early '67 production?

13
It's important, vital perhaps, to have younger enthusiasts in order to maintain value and possibly long term existence of these cars. Welcome to the forum.

14
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: wiper arms and blades
« on: November 21, 2021, 09:39:28 PM »
.... Has there been any reasonable evidence, such as documented original cars, period photos, etc., to support this (or completely disprove it)?

Just allot of San Jose built  pre-Jan sold Mustangs in unrestored condition with satin finish. Would not choose going with the polished earlier look without some solid documentation for it and others build around the same time since there would not be just enough, polished arms, to do a car or 50 cars at the plant

Some federal changes were implemented early while others (example driver side fender in 66) were executed very close to the required date

Ok, fair enough. Jeff, your always excellent photo documentation of original cars shows from about 6R130000 - 136000. My car is 6R113XXX. I would be curious to see anything in that vicinity if it shows up. When I first got my car it had polished non-flaired style, which didn't seem correct. So, not basing anything on that. In the meantime, I'll keep the satin flaired arms that I installed until new information supports otherwise. The polished would look better on my car IMO 🙂.

15
1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H / Re: wiper arms and blades
« on: November 21, 2021, 05:15:50 PM »
My understanding has been the satin-type wiper arms were due to a Federal requirement effective January 1st, 1966. I've seen inputs over the years from owners of presumably unrestored cars or various publications, etc., stating that some early production '66 Mustangs originally came with polished wiper arms. Has there been any reasonable evidence, such as documented original cars, period photos, etc., to support this (or completely disprove it)?
Thanks

Pages: [1] 2 3 4