FYI
We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on December 15, 2023, 03:33:33 PMQuote from: Coralsnake on December 15, 2023, 03:11:25 PMNor am I but the ORIGINAL paperwork on the car is 58 not 48. Raises my curiosity to the point I would hire a good forensic guy to examine the VIN stampings before I threw down my money.
Just to be clear I am not accusing anyone of restamping anything.
Quote from: shelbymann1970 on December 16, 2023, 02:46:47 PMQuote from: FL SAAC on December 16, 2023, 12:10:47 PMone last time and I'll type SLOW for you: Cars that were built at that time that were intended have Shelby conv pkg on the build sheet. This car has NOT A SHELBY on it's build sheet. So are you still saying the intent was to build it as a Shelby when the build sheet says to the contrary?
My dearest and esteemed colleague Gary :
Just want to make sure we are both speaking about the same vehicle
Now on to what is intent?
Having the mind, attention, or will concentrated on something
Layman's version of intent :
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it just may be a duck
This is the VIN # 9F02G482244 on the vehicle
G = Boss 302
48 = only used on Shelby vehicles
Boy if that's not intent and don't know what is
Let's just move on and remember opinions are just like A........pples
Everyone loves A.......apples
Hey who shot J. R. ?Quote from: shelbymann1970 on December 16, 2023, 11:55:12 AMQuote from: FL SAAC on December 16, 2023, 11:12:50 AMTony what I know that you don't know is there was no intent. How do I know that? I have friends who have seen paperwork so there was no intent to build it as a Shelby bodied car.
Viewing the original state of the Shelby Boss and now in it's current state. I personally would have done the same, put the all the Shelby fiberglass on it. I think once this car was conceived the intent was that.
Really can't deny the 48 and the G status on this vehicle
My 3 cents....wish I had more than the 3 cents so I could purchase this one
Quote from: 427hunter on December 16, 2023, 02:18:12 PM
This has become nothing more then another saac form s#!t show. I don't get what the problem is, this car is not being represented as original, everyone knows the history and what it looked like before and after. It's a G48 nothing more to say. I think it a great car and converting it to Shelby trim just made it cooler looking, the car is a great part of Ford/Shelby history.
Quote from: Bob Gaines on December 12, 2023, 12:06:04 PMQuote from: Coralsnake on December 12, 2023, 09:18:56 AMI was a previous owner. It was meant to be built as a Shelby by all evidence but the Shelby conversion was never started on .It was completed at Ford with all the Shelby wiring installed on the Ford line just like any other 69 Shelby but never shipped to Smith . Apparently the program was killed most likely because of the Mustang Boss 302.
Unfortunately, no evidence it was ever built as a Shelby.
Quote from: Don Johnston on December 16, 2023, 12:55:39 PM
I have to remind so many that I am not that guy. He was noted for years of driving fake Ferraris. I drive real Shelbys.
Quote from: shelbymann1970 on December 16, 2023, 11:55:12 AMQuote from: FL SAAC on December 16, 2023, 11:12:50 AMTony what I know that you don't know is there was no intent. How do I know that? I have friends who have seen paperwork so there was no intent to build it as a Shelby bodied car.
Viewing the original state of the Shelby Boss and now in it's current state. I personally would have done the same, put the all the Shelby fiberglass on it. I think once this car was conceived the intent was that.
Really can't deny the 48 and the G status on this vehicle
My 3 cents....wish I had more than the 3 cents so I could purchase this one