SAAC Forum

I think you are missing the sequence. We never said anything to seller or offline. We told buyer privately about it. Seller instigated by childish name calling

Quote from: corbins on February 07, 2018, 07:16:03 PM
Pete (and all others of knowledge) - remember it took 9 years to "fine tune" the old forum. And most A-holes eventually learned to play by the rules or left. This re-start will probably also take some tuning. But if you and others like you abandon ship....it's gonna sink.
JMHO

Steve I hear you but the issue is you don't mind fighting for the truth when people have your back. When forum moderators can't discern between someone who's been supportive of the club/members and another that just wants to make a quick buck then maybe it's time to go elsewhere
I feel a censorship coming

Doug you are off base here. When a seller knowing tells a buyer something is authentic and it isn't that's fraud. Are you condoning that? I can't sorry

Something needs to be done. A fellow forum member sent Pete and i transmission pictures to ask if authentic. Both Pete and I advised him it had phony tag. The seller (no names) starts slamming us because he's been exposed. Next you know there's all kinds of posts firing at me and moderator shuts everything down even though the derogatory stuff is all on one side. Not much respect for 9 years of loyalty
Fences are not made to sit on

Quote from: 1968GT350 on February 07, 2018, 11:36:52 AM
I am sure that you have heard the expression regarding opinions, everyone has one.

And I'm sure you know the one about advice from fools......
Fraud is criminal

For those of you reading and this thread not making sense is because apparently OP deleted original post. Here's what happened
OP had transmission that had what appeared to be a restamped ID tag. A potential buyer forwarded pictures to several knowledgeable people who identified the tag as likely phony. OP should have let it go but couldn't resist trying to slam those that exposed him by referring to them in a derogatory way.
Rob if you delete this from this thread again I will start a new thread you can't touch and will be there for posterity

Quote from: 1968GT350 on February 06, 2018, 07:08:13 PM
In fact that last one sold for well over what I was asking for it while some of the other less gifted experts hmmmed and hawwed about its tag.

Do you mean the less gifted experts that suggested it looked like a re stamped tag?

They did service them but never seen any.  I have quality copies made out of same 3M material
Unlike other repos they are longer to wrap under hood like early cars or can be cut at hood edge for later cars

Found. Thank you forum

Found. Thank you forum

with or without ac is different

Bump

Bump

Quote from: J_Speegle on January 25, 2018, 01:53:28 AM
Cory - Looked through all my pictures and notes and have to offer that I can't find any thing supporting that this is the original one for your car. Nor  the correct style (with fittings) for a car in the 1600's.

Right now I've have examples of no-fitting disc brake master cylinders starting on San Jose built cars starting in the 6R127 range.  Way, before your car was likely built. Believe 6S1203's is a no-fitting version also but that is just one of many I have records of.

Just thought I should share historical data and info to the discussion

+1. Seems very late for brass fitting style

It's S2